The correspondence with Steve Huffman, CEO of Reddit, was published by Zachary Swanson, a user of the nickname whatllmyusernamebe. If someone hoped that in the near future the speech of hatred at Reddit would disappear permanently, they may abandon it.

Swanson starts by emphasizing that he considers his interlocutor to be a good person and asks for a change in Reddit's policy, and more specifically for his admins to pursue the speech of hatred. Huffman replies that there are already rules on aggressive statements and they are enough. The pressured explains that hate speech is simply difficult to define and therefore the rules moderating it are difficult to enforce. Huffman adds that he doesn't want to impose, as a private company, what he can and can't say on anyone. This argument does not hold on, because it does so, for example, by introducing rules prohibiting incitement to aggression.

Swanson published excerpts from this conversation on various sub-reflections, including those concerning the fight against the speech of hatred. He was banned for a week for harassment.
The problems referred to by Huffman did not stop other social media. Want to buy reddit upvotes? Seoclerks is the best service.

Only this year did Reddit lay down the principles for encouraging violence. He stressed that everything that somehow encourages or glorifies violence - including memes, pictures or user names - counts. However, there is nothing in them about the content, that is, what is the essence of the speech of hatred and what distinguishes it from ordinary aggression.

Other social media have their own rules on hate speech, and although they may not be ideal, they also define the problem in some detail, just as moderation does. YouTube and Facebook list protected features that cannot be attacked by others such as gender, sexual orientation, race, or nationality. I do not know if Huffman has read them, but they are no less complicated than the rules relating to incitement to aggression.

We are talking about hatred in Redemptorism.

Reddit has long been accused of ignoring the speech of hatred. The website owners systematically refuse to deal with this matter. In April, Huffman stated that he distinguished between behaviour and beliefs, and that speech of hatred is not behaviour. In a later corrigendum, he explained that closing someone's mouth would not change anything, only a free discussion could change someone's opinions. Clear. As we know, nothing can soften racist statements as one's own racist subreddit, where one can share the speech of hatred.

Reddit's history shows that if the confusion about the spread of racism or homophobia in Reddit reaches a critical point, then there is a great deal of cleaning, during which some subreddits are removed. Then the matter returns to normal. If it can be called that.